Intro to criminal justice Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Intro to turn justice - Coursework ExampleThe Exclusionary rule prevents the government from using evidence obtained in a violation of the geological formation of the joined States. This applies to evidence gained from illegal search and seizure. Furthermore, the court may not apply the rule to arise illegally acquired evidence where the cost of exclusion bug outweighs the deterrent benefits.An example is Herring Vs United States of 2009 in which officers in a coffee county arrested petitioner Herring based on a warrant listed in the contiguous Dale county database. A search carried out by the police yielded drugs and gun. However it was later revealed that the warrant had been recalled several months earlier. on that point is also the case of Arizona VS Evans of 1995. The other cases entangle Weeks Vs United States in which the Supreme Court nemine contradicente held that the seizure of items without warrant from a private residence is a violation of the constitution. There i s as well up the case of Davis Vs United States of 2011, the Escobedo Vs Illinois and finally the case of Mapp Vs Ohio of 1961.It referrers to a situation where a police officer who is mirthful of an individual temporarily detains the person and moves his hands lightly over the suspects outer clothing to find out if the person is carrying a concealed weapon. If the police officer feels something that seems to be weapon, the police may then action inside the victims clothing.Some of the cases that have been associated with stop and frisk in the Supreme Court are include the case of Terry Vs Ohio of the 1968. The case came up when a police officer observed three individuals gentle in a conduct suggestive of robbery. He approached them patted one of them and got a gun. Other cases include the United States Vs Place of 1983, United States Vs Montoya de Hernandez of 1985 and Michigan Vs Chesternut of 1991.Motor vehicle search may only be make under some narrowed circumstances. For e xample only after the